http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45149-2005Mar17.html
"
The GOP claim, asserted in speeches, articles and interviews, is that filibusters against judicial nominees are unprecedented.
...
Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) told his panel this month
...
filibuster being employed for the first time
...
Such claims, however, are at odds with the record of the successful 1968 GOP-led filibuster against President Lyndon B. Johnson's nomination of Abe Fortas to be chief justice of the United States
...
The required number of votes to halt a filibuster then was 67; filibusters can be halted now by 60 of the Senate's 100 members.
...
Frist and others who now threaten to ban filibusters of judicial nominees
...
are trying to provoke a change that isn't defensible through history
"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45149-2005Mar17.html
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4575047
"
the use of the filibuster to delay or block legislation (or a nomination) "has a long history.
...
The term filibuster
...
became popular in the 1850s
...
In 1841, when the Democratic minority hoped to block a bank bill promoted by Henry Clay, Clay threatened to change Senate rules to allow the majority to close debate
...
The record for the longest individual speech goes to South Carolina's J. Strom Thurmond, who filibustered for 24 hours and 18 minutes against the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
"
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4575047
ShalomReport@shalomctr.org wrote:Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 18:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
"
Why not let a bare "majority" of Senators confirm judges? These judges will sit for 20, 30, years.
So what could be temporary Hard Right Congressional/ Presidential power -- reversible in elections -- would instead be enshrined for two generations in the courts.
"
ShalomReport@shalomctr.org wrote:Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 18:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.npr.org/takingissue/20050324_takingissue_judicial.html
"
"The one place where minority voices are still heard is the Senate. It must be allowed to debate, to delay, and yes, even to obstruct."
Ross K. Baker is a professor of political science at Rutgers University and the author of several books on Congress.
"
http://www.npr.org/takingissue/20050324_takingissue_judicial.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(218)
-
▼
April
(13)
- Want to destroy Justice? Nominate bad Judges!
- United States Debt over the years
- Graph of the U.S.Budget Deficit
- Turn a [ditto] head
- Attack on filibuster ("nuclear option") is an Atta...
- A Picture of U.S. wealth distribution
- American Dream = Social Mobility = A Thing of the ...
- Protect yourself. Sunset the unconstitutional Pat...
- An extended middle finger to Planet Earth
- Speak out to save the filibuster
- Poison your kids and get a FREE VIDEO CAMERA!!!
- Preserve the Integrity of the U.S. Senate
- Urgent: speak out against nuclear option
-
▼
April
(13)
No comments:
Post a Comment